Sunday, July 24, 2022

things eternal and things temporal


St Michael's Church, Coolidge, Arizona

O God, the protector of all who trust in you, without whom nothing is strong, nothing is holy: Increase and multiply upon us your mercy; that, with you as our ruler and guide, we may so pass through things temporal, that we lose not the things eternal; through Jesus Christ our Lord, who lives and reigns with you and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.



 We live in a world without kingdoms, except in abstraction or in faraway places. (Sorry if you are English or Dutch.) In America since 1776 or so we have learned to live without a personal sovereign. The people are sovereign. That is abstract. And we are sorting out what it means.  

This affects us not only as citizens, not just as consumers, but as people of faith. As Christians we hold that there is a king indeed, just one not of this world. And we are sorting out what that means. Since about the year 30.


We have some help with that one. Human beings have been puzzling out their relation with the divine being since time began to pierce our consciousness. 


What does it mean to be under God, and not under an earthly sovereign? How then do we further the coming of a kingdom not like earthly kingdoms? “On earth as it is in heaven” - what does that mean, and how do we play a part in its coming to be?


Bishop Michael Curry refers to the ‘realization of the beloved community’ - this is part of it, and a pressing part of it for Americans. The beloved community as envisioned by thinkers from Josiah Royce to Howard Thurman and by activists from A. J. Must to Martin Luther King, is a community where all belong, together. 


Where the lion lies down with the lamb, so to speak. Where we learn to live with each other in harmony, delighting in our differences and celebrating our commonality. Where intolerance is not tolerated, and love is an active verb.


Specifically right now the Episcopal Church, like so many other church bodies and institutions, is aching through a process of reconciliation, restoration, and perhaps restitution, as it takes upon itself the historical necessity of confronting the past.


Sins of the fathers, yours or mine or not ours at all, are still affecting us. We may say we were not there, we did not come into this church or this society or this world until long after those sins were past, over, long forgiven. 


Or, as it turns out, not so much. 


People are saying, my children will have less freedom than I have had. Not just less money, less of a material future, but less in terms of rights. Freedom, liberty, and justice for all.


We may have had it. Or felt we never did. As individuals or as a part of society that has never felt free.


But now we have that in our face. And how can anyone be free if not all of us are?


It is getting harder to say.


***


Part of how it is hard to imagine kingdom come is that we no longer live surrounded by people who believe it is “in heaven” as we long it to be “on earth”. 


Heaven–what is that? Will it pay the rent–yours? It is possible to live now in a way that takes no account of the presence of God, of the imminence and transcendence of his kingdom. At least for a while.


You can live not as if you have stopped believing but as if you do not know what that is. 


Do we? Do we also, as much as we see ourselves as believers, act as if we do?


Functionally are we in our personal and social lives “living into the kingdom”, that is, living as if Jesus is real, and his kingdom is here at the stretch of our hands?


As it is in heaven - so let it be on earth. 


****



Keeping the Faith: Kingdom in its Fullness


Jesus’ disciple asked, “Teach us to pray.” He responded with the Lord’s Prayer. (Luke 11:2-4) 


What does Jesus tell us to ask for first? What are we to ask for? “Thy kingdom come.” Ask with boldness and persistence for the arrival of the reign of God. This comes first. Then request what we need ourselves, personally and as God’s people. “Everything comes from you” David prays. (1 Chronicles 29:14) For us to take our part in establishing God’s kingdom on earth as in heaven, we need: daily sustenance, for which we are dependent on God; reconciliation, for which we are dependent on God; and to be saved from “the time of trial”, for which we are dependent on God.


Only then can we be built into the eternal temple of praise which is the kingdom of God. When David said, “of thine own have we given thee” (1 Chronicles 29:14) he was offering the first fruits of the harvest, as the people would in the Temple. So his prayer was one of thanksgiving, and one of celebration. 


Of course the “Temple not built with hands” – that is the eternal place of offering – is what Jesus is bringing into daily life. Incarnate in him is the word of God, and making real in the world the kingdom he proclaims is the duty and the invitation he gives his followers: us.


When we pray “thy kingdom come” we are participating in the coming of his kingdom. When we ask for what we need from the one on whom we are dependent for everything, we are saying he is Lord. And when we ask to be forgiven and freed from temptation, we are saying he is Savior.


And we are saying make us instruments of thy peace, thy salvation, thy shalom, thy reign of peace.


In a recent essay on the website of the Episcopal diocese of Arizona, Canon Pam Hyde invites us to rethink dominion - particularly our sense of “dominion over” the rest of creation. Of course this is part of our rethinking what “kingdom come” might look like. Maybe it really is like the “peaceable kingdom” depicted in 19th Century American art, where lion and lamb lie down together and human beings, explorers and indigenous people, alike, are able to find a place for all beings. (Isaiah 11:6-9)


Don’t hold your breath, I hear you say. “What about–?” What about the travesty of settler lifestyles that tear apart the very fabric of the natural world, through mineral extraction and agricultural industrialization? What about the continuing and historic exploitation of one species by another, not to mention one set of people by another?


How are we to live without exerting our dominion, our “power over” others, as if it were by divine right, even divine mandate? Is not this our “manifest destiny” as Americans, indeed, as the human race?


What does it mean to have “dominion over” anything if God is really in charge? Ask Elizabeth II, queen of England: she has had 70 years to think this one over. She may be sovereign, in her realm, but it is only under God, under the blessing, under the mercy, and under obedience.


How do we play faithful to that mercy, how do we conform to that obedience, how do we share that blessing? The blessing that is the coming and immanent kingdom of God, the ‘dominion’ if you will, that is without end as it is indeed without beginning? The truth is, God reigns now. 


If we could only see it. Sometimes it is hard to see. A traffic accident on the freeway, a senseless act of destruction, an unkindness where a helping hand is called for. Cruelty, gratuitous and severe. Capricious catastrophe.


So we ask for the kingdom to come, to become real. In the meantime, the between-time, between the asking and the fulfillment of the prayer, we are the ones who begin to make it real.


We do this in us-sized ways. We do it in small kindnesses, large life choices, common acts in common life, and unseen acts of small mercies.


We ask for the kingdom to come, and then we pray for what we need to live into its reality.


In Paul’s letter to the church in Colossus, we get a picture of a cosmic Christ, one “in whom the fullness of God is pleased to dwell” and one from whom we receive our own “fullness” as his creatures and his people. “For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, and you have come to fullness in him, who is the head of every ruler and authority.” (1:19, 2:9-10)


“Fullness” in Christ means a completion of being, a perfection in direction and in action. We sense moments of fullness already; in him our joy will be made complete. 


So dominion and fullness meet in the presence of the Lord. God is the source of all being, therefore the one in whom all authority finally resides; our ‘dominion’ is partial and contingent. And yet our completion, the fulfillment of our calling and our gift as creatures, is already at work through Christ in us. 


We have the challenge of living into that in-coming and already-here state of being.


How can we possibly do this by ourselves? As individuals, as a church, as a society, as the human race? 


We don’t have to do it alone: for the one who creates us is the one who redeems us is the one who inspires and empowers us. By our side, along with us, God is present in the Spirit, and in each other.


We are not there yet, not yet in the kingdom to come, but we work to make it so, and we long for its arrival. In the grace of God and under the mercy. Amen.



The Rev. Dr. John Leech studied history and religion at the University of California, Santa Cruz. He serves as a priest associate at the Episcopal Church of Saint Matthew in Tucson. This sermon was given at St Michael's Church, Coolidge, Ariz. http://stmichaelscoolidge.com/




Genesis 18:20-32
Psalm 138
Colossians 2:6-15, (16-19)
Luke 11:1-13

Hosea 1:2-10
Psalm 85
Colossians 2:6-15, (16-19)
Luke 11:1-13


https://azdiocese.org/2022/06/rethinking-dominion/

https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.59908.html


Charles Taylor, A Secular Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007.


Wednesday, July 20, 2022

kingdom come

We live in a country without kingdoms, except in abstraction or in faraway places. In America since 1776 or so we have learned to live without a personal sovereign. The people are sovereign. That is abstract. And we are sorting out what it means.  


This affects us not only as citizens, not just as consumers, but as people of faith. As Christians we hold that there is a king indeed, just one not of this world. And we are sorting out what that means. Since about the year 30.


We have some help with that one. Human beings have been puzzling out their relation with the divine being since time began to pierce our consciousness. 


What does it mean to be under God, and not under an earthly sovereign? How then do we further the coming of a kingdom not like earthly kingdoms? “On earth as it is in heaven” - what does that mean, and how do we play a part in its coming to be?


Bishop Michael Curry refers to the ‘realization of the beloved community’ - this is part of it, and a pressing part of it for Americans. The beloved community as envisioned by thinkers from Josiah Royce to Howard Thurman and by activists from A. J. Must to Martin Luther King, is a community where all belong, together. 


Where the lion lies down with the lamb, so to speak. Where we learn to live with each other in harmony, delighting in our differences and celebrating our commonality. Where intolerance is not tolerated, and love is an active verb.


Specifically right now the Episcopal Church, like so many other church bodies and institutions, is aching through a process of reconciliation, restoration, and perhaps restitution, as it takes upon itself the historical necessity of confronting the past.


Sins of the fathers, yours or mine or not ours at all, are still affecting us. We may say we were not there, we did not come into this church or this society or this world until long after those sins were past, over, long forgiven. 


Or, as it turns out, not so much. 


People are saying, my children will have less freedom than I have had. Not just less money, less of a material future, but less in terms of rights. Freedom, liberty, and justice for all.


We may have had it. Or felt we never did. As individuals or as a part of society that has never felt free.


But now we have that in our face. And how can anyone be free if not all of us are?


It is getting harder to say.


***


Part of how it is hard to imagine kingdom come is that we no longer live surrounded by people who believe it is “in heaven” as we long it to be “on earth”. 


Heaven–what is that? Will it pay the rent–yours? It is possible to live now in a way that takes no account of the presence of God, of the imminence and transcendence of his kingdom. At least for a while.


You can live not as if you have stopped believing but as if you do not know what that is. 


Do we? Do we also, as much as we see ourselves as believers, act as if we do?


Functionally are we in our personal and social lives “living into the kingdom”, that is, living as if Jesus is real, and his kingdom is here at the stretch of our hands?


As it is in heaven - so let it be on earth. 


***



Charles Taylor, A Secular Age. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.


Michael Curry. Remarks during the 80th General Convention of The Episcopal Church. 


See also  https://www.episcopalchurch.org/publicaffairs/episcopal-church-presiding-bishop-michael-currys-comments-to-house-of-bishops-on-july-9/


JRL+

Saturday, July 16, 2022

Gomer

 


Gomer marries Hosea and bears him three children. This along with the usual cooking, cleaning, and housekeeping he probably expects. This despite his considering her an unfaithful wife, and naming her children, morosely, Jezreel, Lo-ruhamah, and Lo-ammi. This despite his considering their marriage a fitting prophetic allegory for the relationship of Israel and Judah to their God. The God, of course, who won a bet on the patience of Job, after he endured, and his family and household suffered, numerous trials. 


What is this story doing in the Bible? Surely we are not meant to take it literally or as a model of how to behave. Is it a model of how God behaves? 


Apparently we are to take it as that, only so far as it portrays God as vengeful (Jezreel), pitiless and unforgiving (Lo-ruhamah), and abandoning (Lo-ammi), toward his “unfaithful spouse”, and yet as then forgiven and made numberless and named again "Children of the living God." This restoration - or replacement - is supposed to make everything alright, I guess.


Does retribution, revenge, or reparation, make up for punishment and abandonment? Is this God’s justice?


Go marry a wife of whoredom and have children of whoredom, the Lord commands Hosea when he first speaks through him, and then says why: the Land commits whoredom by forsaking the Lord. Then the offspring, first the defeat and destruction of Israel (the northern kingdom) in the valley of Jezreel, then the forsaking of that kingdom but the salvation of the southern kingdom (Judah), and third the divorce of God and the people followed by the restitution of their union.


Browsing in the public library I picked up Evelyn Waugh’s Second World War trilogy, Sword of Honour, and found in it a typically serio-comic English hero, a guy named Guy, who married then lost, to a series of lovers, a heroically promiscuous wife, Virginia, whom he (spoiler alert) finally takes back in her extremity of need. Furthermore, God through the Church takes her in as one of her own. 


Crazy story. But then, so is prayer, in its entreaty and in its hope. Listen to the Psalmist (85):


1 You have been gracious to your land, O Lord, * you have restored the good fortune of Jacob.

2 You have forgiven the iniquity of your people * and blotted out all their sins.

3 You have withdrawn all your fury * and turned yourself from your wrathful indignation.

4 Restore us then, O God our Savior; * let your anger depart from us.


9 Truly, his salvation is very near to those who fear him, * that his glory may dwell in our land.

10 Mercy and truth have met together; * righteousness and peace have kissed each other.

11 Truth shall spring up from the earth, * and righteousness shall look down from heaven.



JRL+


https://www.christiancentury.org/article/living-word/july-24-ordinary-17c-hosea-12-10


Monday, July 11, 2022

Kingdom in its Fullness



Peaceable Kingdom.
Edward Hicks, ca. 1834, public domain.
https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.59908.html


Keeping the Faith: Kingdom in its Fullness


Jesus’ disciple asked, “Teach us to pray.” He responded with the Lord’s Prayer.  


What does Jesus tell us to ask for first? What are we to ask for? “Thy kingdom come.” Ask with boldness and persistence for the arrival of the reign of God. This comes first. Then request what we need ourselves, personally and as God’s people. “Everything comes from you” David prays. (1 Chronicles 29:14) 


For us to take our part in establishing God’s kingdom on earth as in heaven, we need: daily sustenance, for which we are dependent on God; reconciliation, for which we are dependent on God; and to be saved from “the time of trial”, for which we are dependent on God.


Only then can we be built into the eternal temple of praise which is the kingdom of God. When David said, “of thine own have we given thee” (1 Chronicles 29:14) he was offering the first fruits of the harvest, as the people would in the Temple. So his prayer was one of thanksgiving, and one of celebration. 


Of course the “Temple not built with hands” – that is the eternal place of offering – is what Jesus is bringing into daily life. Incarnate in him is the word of God, and making real in the world the kingdom he proclaims is the duty and the invitation he gives his followers: us.


When we pray “thy kingdom come” we are participating in the coming of his kingdom. When we ask for what we need from the one on whom we are dependent for everything, we are saying he is Lord. And when we ask to be forgiven and freed from temptation, we are saying he is Savior.


And we are saying make us instruments of thy peace, thy salvation, thy shalom, thy reign of peace.


In a recent essay on the website of the Episcopal diocese of Arizona, Canon Pam Hyde invites us to rethink dominion - particularly our sense of “dominion over” the rest of creation. Of course this is part of our rethinking what “kingdom come” might look like. 


Maybe it really is like the “peaceable kingdom” depicted in 19th Century American art, where lion and lamb lie down together and human beings, explorers and indigenous people, alike, are able to find a place for all beings. (Isaiah 11:6-9) 


Don’t hold your breath, I hear you say. “What about–?” What about the travesty of settler lifestyles that tear apart the very fabric of the natural world, through mineral extraction and agricultural industrialization? What about the continuing and historic exploitation of one species by another, not to mention one set of people by another?


How are we to live without exerting our dominion, our “power over” others, as if it were by divine right, even divine mandate? Is not this our “manifest destiny” as Americans, indeed, as the human race?


What does it mean to have “dominion over” anything if God is really in charge? Ask Elizabeth II, queen of England: she has had 70 years to think this one over. She may be sovereign, in her realm, but it is only under God, under the blessing, under the mercy, and under obedience.


How do we play faithful to that mercy, how do we conform to that obedience, how do we share that blessing? The blessing that is the coming and immanent kingdom of God, the ‘dominion’ if you will, that is without end as it is indeed without beginning? The truth is, God reigns now. 


If we could only see it. Sometimes it is hard to see. A traffic accident on the freeway, a senseless act of destruction, an unkindness where a helping hand is called for. Cruelty, gratuitous and severe. Capricious catastrophe.


So we ask for the kingdom to come, to become real. In the meantime, the between-time, between the asking and the fulfillment of the prayer, we are the ones who begin to make it real.


We do this in us-sized ways. We do it in small kindnesses, large life choices, common acts in common life, and unseen acts of small mercies.


We ask for the kingdom to come, and then we pray for what we need to live into its reality.


In Paul’s letter to the church in Colossus, we get a picture of a cosmic Christ, one “in whom the fullness of God is pleased to dwell” and one from whom we receive our own “fullness” as his creatures and his people. “For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, and you have come to fullness in him, who is the head of every ruler and authority.” (1:19, 2:9-10)


“Fullness” in Christ means a completion of being, a perfection in direction and in action. We sense moments of fullness already; in him our joy will be made complete. 


So dominion and fullness meet in the presence of the Lord. God is the source of all being, therefore the one in whom all authority finally resides; our ‘dominion’ is partial and contingent. And yet our completion, the fulfillment of our calling and our gift as creatures, is already at work through Christ in us. 


We have the challenge of living into that in-coming and already-here state of being.


How can we possibly do this by ourselves? As individuals, as a church, as a society, as the human race? 


We don’t have to do it alone: for the one who creates us is the one who redeems us is the one who inspires and empowers us. By our side, along with us, God is present in the Spirit, and in each other.


We are not there yet, not yet in the kingdom to come, but we work to make it so, and we long for its arrival. In the grace of God and under the mercy. Amen.



The Rev. Dr. John Leech studied history and religion at the University of California, Santa Cruz. His professional education was through the Graduate Theological Union and Seattle University. He serves as a priest associate at the Episcopal Church of Saint Matthew in Tucson. An edited version of this essay appears in the Keeping the Faith section of the Arizona Daily Star, Sunday July 24th 2022 page E3.


Charles Taylor, A Secular Age. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.


James K. A. Smith, How (Not) to be Secular: Reading Charles Taylor. Grand Rapids MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2014.


David L. Bartlett & Barbara Brown Taylor, eds. Feasting on the Word: Preaching the Revised Common Lectionary. Year C, Volume 3. Louisville KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2010.


Joseph A. Fitzmyer, S.J. The Gospel According to Luke X-XXIV. The Anchor Bible, v. 28-28A. New York: Doubleday, 1985.



https://azdiocese.org/2022/06/rethinking-dominion/

https://www.nga.gov/collection/art-object-page.59908.html


Charles Taylor, A Secular Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2007.


Sunday, July 3, 2022

A healing more than skin deep

 A HEALING DEEPER THAN THE SKIN


Imagine a play in five acts with several actors…


Act I. Naamans house. Syria. 

Slave girl from the land of Israel, a captive (to Naamans wife): 

If only my lord were with the prophet who is in Samaria! He would cure him of his leprosy.”


Act II. The Palace. Syria. 

Naaman tells his king what the girl said. 

The king of Syria: 

Go then, and I will send along a letter to the king of Israel.”


Act III. The Palace. Israel. 

Naaman presents the letter. It reads: 

When this letter reaches you, know that I have sent to you my servant Naaman, that you may cure him of his leprosy.”

The king rends his garments, and says: 

Am I God, to give death or life, that this man sends word to me to cure a man of his leprosy? Just look and see how he is trying to pick a quarrel with me.”


Act IV. Scene 1. Elishas house. Israel. The prophet hears the king has rent his clothes. He sends a message: 

Why have you torn your clothes? Let him come to me, that he may learn that there is a prophet in Israel.”


Act IV. Scene 2. The palace, Israel. The message is delivered. Naaman goes.


Act IV. Scene 3. The entrance to Elishas house. 

Elisha sends a messenger to Naaman. The message reads: 

Go, wash in the Jordan seven times, and your flesh shall be restored and you shall be clean.”

Naaman reacts angrily, and goes away mad, saying: 

I thought…”

Servants of Naaman: 

Father, if the prophet…”


Act V. The river Jordan. Naaman washes. He is made clean.


***


A healing that goes deeper than skin


Five places, several characters - a small play in itself. If there were a feast of the healing of Naaman, we could have a pageant, choose parts and wear costumes. Maybe a paper mache crown or two, and a cloth river. Or a tub. The costume department might be wary of lending anything good for royal robes. 


If you have visited a Jewish friends synagogue on the feast of Purim you might have enjoyed a dramatic or even musical comedy performance of that story, about the salvation of Jews in Babylon from certain death, through the intervention of a brave woman and her uncle. 


In this story a brave girl, and some servants, all unnamed, speak up. The girl, a slave in a foreign house, tells her captors wife how he can be healed. And the servants of that powerful man, a mighty warrior, speak truth to power, even when he is angry, to further the cause of healing.


The man himself, the Syrian general, comes on stage third. He has listened to his wife who has listened to the girl, and now he reports to his king. Who sends him on his way to the small kingdom of Israel, with a letter. 


This is not a story about saving Jews, it is a story about Jews saving others. The girl, and then the prophet, who appears only through messages, work the work of healing a person that they might not like or want to help.


And yet, as Jesus points out, God sent the prophet Elisha to the stranger Naaman to heal him, rather than to anyone in Israel. 


What is God up to here? What is this story about?


We see a mighty man, humiliated. First, by a disease, seemingly incurable except by some extraordinary means. Then, by the prescription written for him. Go jump in the creek, that one over there. 


We see a king expecting a royal favor, from another king, possibly one in fear of his greater power. We see the other king, knowing he is powerless, not only in front of the other king, but in front of God.


And yet - when the first message from the prophet arrives, he sends the leprous general to him.


(By the way, the word leprosy is used here, not of Hansen's Disease, the affliction we commonly call leprosy, but of something else, a scaly skin affliction which rendered the sufferer unclean.)


Naaman goes to the prophets house. At the door he receives the second message. 


Like the king he has served, the prophet sends Naaman on his way with a message. 


This seems underplayed, even impertinent. Perhaps the prophet does not want this mighty stranger, perhaps an enemy, in his house. We dont know. 


But he sends him to do something simple. Not royal, not flashy. Worse than that.


It requires the great man from Syria to humble himself before the one true and living God.


That takes some persuasion. Bravely, the servants speak simple truth to power. 


If he had asked you something difficult, would you not do it?


This is difficult!


It requires a revolution. Perhaps in the past the general had believed that the exercise of power is the same thing as the exercise of leadership”, as was observed of a 20th century President.


He learns differently now.


Humility and obedience. Before not a king, not an army, but in front of something greater than any human force.


He washes. And is clean.


And God accomplishes a healing that goes deeper than skin.


***


While I tend to think of healing as a personal, even private, thing, it was hardly so for Naaman the Syrian - or the followers of Jesus. For the Aramean commander to submit to the Jewish God had political implications - and certainly what the 70 had done, when Jesus sent them out two by two, must have made a vast impact upon the Galilean countryside. 


Who is this prophet and the God that he serves? Kings send messages - and now so does he.


Who is this later prophet who does the same - and more? Is he also above all earthly kings? Is his healing also more than physical? Yes, it is, for it is the proclamation, the showing, of the kingdom of God. 


Even the demons submit to them, the messengers come in his name, as they report with joy - and the word spoken in the name of the Lord does not return empty. 


Israels northern kingdom, in the time of the prophet Elisha, might fade, as did Aram, its enemy, because north beyond the Jordan and even the distant rivers of Damascus lay Assyria, a greater imperial power than all of these.


And later, in the days of the Gospels, you would think there would be no greater power than this then ultimate empire of Rome. 


But there is something beyond earthly powers that transcends them all, and even as Naaman the Syrian and the Gospel people of Galilee bow their heads to it, they acknowledge that power and healing come from the one in whom they put their ultimate faith.


As the servants invited their master, as the servant girl informed her mistress, there is something more, beyond earthly ideas of power and leadership. And then indeed his strength is found in our weakness, his power in our humility, and his healing in our trust.


It wont look like earthly healing, not necessarily, but at work it is more than we could ask or even imagine.


***


This story turns in focus from court and king to prophet and country, from human power to God.


We are invited to do the same. To recognize that the powers of this world, however confident, are small. 


The real power is in something unstated here, except through the simple words of servants, and the messengers who bear the word from the prophet to the powerful.


Maybe we can do some of that too. Like Naaman realize that God does not require our bribes, however magnificent. He doesnt need that stuff, not silver, not gold, not royal robes, not fanfare. 


Just trust. Obedience and humility, and beneath and behind them, trust.


And that faith will change the world.


****


JRL+

Sunday, July 3, 2022.

Episcopal Church of Saint Matthew, Tucson.


2 Kings 5:1-14
Psalm 30
Galatians 6:(1-6)7-16
Luke 10:1-11, 16-20

https://www.lectionarypage.net/YearC_RCL/Pentecost/CProp9_RCL.html

https://members.sundaysandseasons.com/Home/TextsAndResources#texts


***
The Jewish Study Bible, ed. 2, Adele Berlin and Marc Zvi Brettler, eds. Oxford University Press. 2004, 2014. Jewish Publication Society, Tanakh translation. 1985, 1999.


Feasting on the Word. Preaching the Revised Common Lectionary. Year C, Volume 3. David L. Bartlett and Barbara Brown Taylor, eds. Westminster John Knox Press. 2010.


http://edgeofenclosure.org/proper9c.html

https://lectionary.library.vanderbilt.edu/texts.php?id=269

http://www.textweek.com/yearc/properc9.htm

https://politicaltheology.com/resource-less-or-resourceful-2-kings-51-14/

https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/ordinary-14-3/commentary-on-2-kings-51-14-7



‘Nixon believed, Gergen wrote, that “the exercise of power is the same thing as the exercise of leadership.” – Elizabeth Drew. Richard M. Nixon. The American Presidents. Thorndike Press. 2007. 72. quoting David Gergen. Eyewitness to Power: The Essence of Leadership, Nixon to Clinton. New York: Simon and Schuster. 42-45.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0SZ-pwx2rX4